विकिपीडिया:उल्लेखनीयता (लोग)

विकिपीडिया पर, उल्लेखनीयता सम्पादकों द्वारा प्रयुक्त एक प्रशिक्षण है, यह निर्धारित करने के लिए कि किसी दत्त विषय का अपना लेख होना चाहिए या नहीं। लोगों के लिए, वह व्यक्ति, जो उस वैयक्तिक लेख का विषय हो, "उल्लेख"^[1] या "ध्यान के क़ाबिल" होना चाहिए^[2] – अर्थात्, इतना "ध्यानयोग्य"^[2] या "महत्वपूर्ण, दिलचस्प या असामान्य हो" कि विकिपीडिया के भीतर उस व्यक्ति का लिखित वर्णन "ध्यान के लायक हो या रिकॉर्ड करने लायक हो"।^[1] "उल्लेखनीय" "प्रसिद्ध" या "लोकप्रिय" होने के अर्थ में – यद्यपि असंगत नहीं – अप्रधान हैं।

मूलभूत मापदण्ड

Shortcut

वि:मूलभूत

लोग उल्लेखनीय माने जाते हैं, यदि उन्होंने अनेक प्रकाशित^[3] माध्यमिक स्रोतों में महत्वपूर्ण व्याप्ति (कवरेज) प्राप्त की हो, जो स्रोत विश्वसनीय हो, एक दूसरे से बौद्धिक रूप से स्वतन्त्र हो^[4] और विषय से स्वतन्त्र हो।^[5]

यदि किसी दत्त स्रोत में व्याप्ति की गहराई सारभूत न हो, तो उल्लेखनीयता प्रदर्शित करने के लिए अनेक स्वतन्त्र स्रोतों को जोड़ा जा सकता हैं; माध्यमिक स्रोतों द्वारा किसी विषय की तुच्छ व्याप्ति उल्लेखनीयता स्थापित करने के लिए पर्याप्त नहीं हो सकती।^[6]
किसी लेख में सामग्री का समर्थन करने के लिए प्राथमिक स्रोतों का प्रयोग किया जा सकता हैं, पर वे विषय की उल्लेखनीयता साबित करने के लिए योगदान नहीं करते।

जो लोग मूलभूत मापदण्ड का अनुपालन करते हो, वे नीचे दिएँ गएँ अतिरिक्त मापदण्डों का अनुपालन कियें बगैर भी उल्लेखनीय माने जा सकते हैं। ऐसे लोगों के लिए फिर भी लेख नहीं बनाएँ जा सकते यदि वे अपवर्जनात्मक मापदण्ड के तहत आते हो, जैसे कि केवल एक घटना के लिए उल्लेखनीय, या जैसे कि वे जो "विकिपीडिया क्या नहीं है" में सूचीबद्ध हो।

अतिरिक्त मापदण्ड

लोगों के उल्लेखनीय होने की सम्भावना होती हैं, यदि वे निम्न मानकों में से किसी एक का भी अनुपालन करें। इन मापदण्डों का अनुपालन न कर पाने की असफलता इस बात का निष्कर्षीय सबूत नहीं है कि कोई विषय समावेशित नहीं किया जाना चाहिए; विपरीततः, एक या अनेक का अनुपालन इस बात की गारंटी नहीं देता कि कोई विषय समावेशित किया जाना चाहिए।

कोई व्यक्ति जो इन अतिरिक्त मापदण्डों का अनुपालन नहीं कर पाता, वह विकिपीडिया:उल्लेखनीयता के तहत फिर भी उल्लेखनीय हो सकता है। सम्पादकों को ये मापदण्ड उपयोगी महसूस हो सकते हैं, यह निर्धारित करने के लिए कि किसी लेख को अतिरिक्त उद्धरणों की आवश्यकता हैं, ऐसे टैग करें ({{बीएलपी स्रोतों}} के ज़रिये उदाहरणार्थ), या इसके बजाए हटाने की चर्चा प्रारम्भ करें।

सन्दर्भ

↑ ^अ ^आ "Notable". Encarta. Archived from the original by Internet Archive.
↑ ^अ ^आ American Heritage Dictionary definition Retrieved 17 January 2015
↑ What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad.
↑ Sources that are pure derivatives of an original source can be used as references, but do not contribute toward establishing the notability of a subject. "Intellectual independence" requires not only that the content of sources be non-identical, but also that the entirety of content in a published work not be derived from (or based in) another work (partial derivations are acceptable). For example, a speech by a politician about a particular person contributes toward establishing the notability of that person, but multiple reproductions of the transcript of that speech by different news outlets do not. A biography written about a person contributes toward establishing his or her notability, but a summary of that biography lacking an original intellectual contribution does not.
↑ Autobiography and self-promotion are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself have actually considered the subject notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. Thus, entries in biographical dictionaries that accept self-nominations (such as the Marquis Who's Who) do not contribute toward notability, nor do web pages about an organization's own staff or members.
↑ Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ("John Smith at Big Company said..." or "Mary Jones was hired by My University") that does not discuss the subject in detail. A credible 200-page independent biography of a person that covers that person's life in detail is non-trivial, whereas a birth certificate or a 1-line listing on an election ballot form is not. Database sources such as Notable Names Database, Internet Movie Database and Internet Adult Film Database are not considered credible since they are, like many wikis, mass-edited with little oversight. Additionally, these databases have low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion. In addition, in cases like the Internet Movie Database, inclusion is routine for people in the associated domain and can therefore especially not be taken as evidence of notability.

[Encarta-1] अ ^आ "Notable". Encarta. Archived from the original by Internet Archive.

[Heritage-2] अ ^आ American Heritage Dictionary definition Retrieved 17 January 2015

[note2-3] What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad.

[note3-4] Sources that are pure derivatives of an original source can be used as references, but do not contribute toward establishing the notability of a subject. "Intellectual independence" requires not only that the content of sources be non-identical, but also that the entirety of content in a published work not be derived from (or based in) another work (partial derivations are acceptable). For example, a speech by a politician about a particular person contributes toward establishing the notability of that person, but multiple reproductions of the transcript of that speech by different news outlets do not. A biography written about a person contributes toward establishing his or her notability, but a summary of that biography lacking an original intellectual contribution does not.

[note4-5] Autobiography and self-promotion are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself have actually considered the subject notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. Thus, entries in biographical dictionaries that accept self-nominations (such as the Marquis Who's Who) do not contribute toward notability, nor do web pages about an organization's own staff or members.

[note5-6] Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ("John Smith at Big Company said..." or "Mary Jones was hired by My University") that does not discuss the subject in detail. A credible 200-page independent biography of a person that covers that person's life in detail is non-trivial, whereas a birth certificate or a 1-line listing on an election ballot form is not. Database sources such as Notable Names Database, Internet Movie Database and Internet Adult Film Database are not considered credible since they are, like many wikis, mass-edited with little oversight. Additionally, these databases have low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion. In addition, in cases like the Internet Movie Database, inclusion is routine for people in the associated domain and can therefore especially not be taken as evidence of notability.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]