|
==मूलभूत मापदण्ड==
{{anchor|Basic Criteria}}
{{See also|Wikipediaविकिपीडिया:General notability guideline}}
{{shortcut|WPवि:BASICमूलभूत}}
लोग '''उल्लेखनीय''' माने जाते हैं, यदि उन्होंने अनेक प्रकाशित माध्यमिक स्रोतों में महत्वपूर्ण व्याप्ति (कवरेज) प्राप्त की हो, जो स्रोत विश्वसनीय हो, एक दूसरे से बौद्धिक रूप से स्वतन्त्र हो और विषय से स्वतन्त्र हो।
People are presumed '''notable''' if they have received significant coverage in multiple published<ref name="note2">What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad.</ref> [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable]], intellectually independent of each other,<ref name="note3">Sources that are pure derivatives of an original source can be used as references, but do not contribute toward establishing the notability of a subject. "Intellectual independence" requires not only that the content of sources be non-identical, but also that the entirety of content in a published work not be derived from (or based in) another work (partial derivations are acceptable). For example, a speech by a politician about a particular person contributes toward establishing the notability of that person, but multiple reproductions of the transcript of that speech by different news outlets do not. A biography written about a person contributes toward establishing his or her notability, but a summary of that biography lacking an original intellectual contribution does not.</ref> and [[WP:Independent sources|independent of the subject]].<ref name="note4">Autobiography and self-promotion are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the subject itself have actually considered the subject notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. Thus, entries in biographical dictionaries that accept self-nominations (such as the [[Marquis Who's Who]]) do not contribute toward notability, nor do web pages about an organization's own staff or members.</ref>
* If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.<ref name="note5">Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ("John Smith at Big Company said..." or "Mary Jones was hired by My University") that does not discuss the subject in detail. A credible 200-page independent biography of a person that covers that person's life in detail is non-trivial, whereas a birth certificate or a 1-line listing on an election ballot form is not. Database sources such as [[Notable Names Database]], [[Internet Movie Database]] and [[Internet Adult Film Database]] are not considered credible since they are, like many [[wiki]]s, mass-edited with little oversight. Additionally, these databases have low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion. In addition, in cases like the Internet Movie Database, inclusion is [[WP:ROUTINE|routine]] for people in the associated domain and can therefore especially not be taken as evidence of notability.</ref>
* [[Primary source]]s may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. ▼
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[7]
People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as [[#People notable for only one event|being notable only for a single event]], or such as those listed in [[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]. ▼▲* [[Primary source]]ssources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
▲People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as [[#People notable for only one event|being notable only for a single event ]], or such as those listed in [[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not ]].
==अतिरिक्त मापदण्ड==
| 