"लेबर पार्टी (यूके)": अवतरणों में अंतर
Content deleted Content added
छो बॉट: date प्रारूप बदला। |
छो clean up, replaced: |date=September → |date=सितम्बर, |date=March → |date=मार्च, |date=May → |date=मई AWB के साथ |
||
पंक्ति 1:
{{सुधालेख}}
<!-- {{Use dmy dates|date=
{{pp-semi-vandalism|small=yes}} -->
{{Infobox political party
पंक्ति 108:
[[:en:TULO - The Trade Union & Labour Party Liaison Organisation|टुलो (मजदूर संघ और लेबर दल संपर्क संस्था)]] लेबर दल से संबन्धित सदस्यों के लिए राष्ट्रीय व चेत्रीय स्तर पर चुनाव प्रचार, संपर्क अभियानों का जिम्मा सम्भालती है।<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.labour.org.uk/tulo/|title=TULO}}</ref>
चूंकि यह मजदूर संघों द्वारा कामकाज़ी लोगों के हितों की आवाज उठाने के लिये बनाई गई थी, लेबर पार्टी का विभिन्न मजदूर संघों से जुडाव हमेशा से ही इसके चाल-चरित्र व नीतियों का निर्धारक रहा है। हाल के वर्षों में यह संबंधों में खटास बढ गयी थी जब रेल व यातायात कर्मियों के संघ को स्कॉटलैंड में अपनी शाखाओं के [[स्कॉटिश समाजवादी दल]] से संबद्धता रखने की अनुमति देने की वजह से २००४ में पार्टी से निष्कासित कर दिया गया था।<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3432409.stm|title=RMT 'breached' Labour party rules|date=27 जनवरी 2004|accessdate=२१ जुलाई २०१५}}</ref> अन्य संघों में भी सदस्यों ने लेबर दल को आर्थिक मदद कम करने की आवाज़ उठाई।<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3810417.stm|title=Labour's link to unions in danger|publisher=बीबीसी|date=16 June 2004}}</ref> और [[निजीकरण]], सराकारी खर्चों में कटौती व मजदूर संघों के खिलाफ बनाए गये नियमों के बारे में अपनी राय रखने के लिए किसी अन्य ज्यादा प्रभावी राजनीतिक दल को समर्थन दें।<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.congressvoices.org/2009/84-political-representation-of-members/|title=CWU resolution to TUC Congress 2009 |publisher=टीयूसी काँग्रेस वॉएसेज़|accessdate=13 अप्रैल 2010}}{{dead link|date=
| title = Miliband urges 'historic' changes to Labour's union links: Transparent
| url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23234340
पंक्ति 259:
२००५ में लेबर पार्टी एक बार फिर सरकार के लिए चुनी गई।
<!--
Blair announced in September 2006 that he would quit as leader within the year, though he had been under pressure to quit earlier than May 2007 in order to get a new leader in place before the May elections which were expected to be disastrous for Labour.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5322094.stm I will quit within a year – Blair] बीबीसी न्यूज़, 7 September 2007</ref> In the event, the party did lose power in Scotland to a minority [[Scottish National Party]] government at the [[Scottish Parliament election, 2007|2007 elections]] and, shortly after this, Blair resigned as Prime Minister and was replaced by his [[Chancellor of the Exchequer|Chancellor]], [[Gordon Brown]]. Although the party experienced a brief rise in the polls after this, its popularity soon slumped to its lowest level since the days of [[Michael Foot]]. During May 2008, Labour suffered heavy defeats in the [[London mayoral election, 2008|London mayoral election]], [[United Kingdom local elections, 2008|local elections]] and the loss in the [[Crewe and Nantwich by-election, 2008|Crewe and Nantwich by-election]], culminating in the party registering its worst ever opinion poll result since records began in 1943, of 23%, with many citing Brown's leadership as a key factor.<ref>{{cite news |first=Jeremy |last=Lovell |title=Brown hit by worst party rating |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUKL2944559620080530 |agency=Reuters |date=30 May 2008|accessdate=28 June 2008}}</ref> Membership of the party also reached a low ebb, falling to 156,205 by the end of 2009: over 40 per cent of the 405,000 peak reached in 1997 and thought to be the lowest total since the party was founded.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/2475301/Labour-membership-falls-to-historic-low.html | location=London | work=The Daily Telegraph | first1=James | last1=Kirkup | first2=Rosa | last2=Prince | title=Labour Party membership falls to lowest level since it was founded in 1900 | date=30 July 2008}}</ref><ref>[http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snsg-05125.pdf John Marshall: Membership of UK political parties; House of Commons, SN/SG/5125; 2009, page 9]{{dead link|date=
Finance proved a major problem for the Labour Party during this period; a "[[cash for peerages]]" scandal under Blair resulted in the drying up of many major sources of donations. Declining party membership, partially due to the reduction of activists' influence upon policy-making under the reforms of [[Neil Kinnock]] and Blair, also contributed to financial problems. Between January and March 2008, the Labour Party received just over £3 million in donations and were £17 million in debt; compared to the Conservatives' £6 million in donations and £12 million in debt.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/news-and-media/news-releases/electoral-commission-media-centre/news-releases-donations/new-figures-published-showing-political-partiesrsquo-donations-and-borrowing|title=New figures published showing political parties’ donations and borrowing|date=22 May 2008|publisher=[[Electoral Commission (United Kingdom)|The Electoral Commission]]|accessdate=2 July 2008}}</ref>
|