"सामाजिक स्वामित्व": अवतरणों में अंतर

आकार में बदलाव नहीं आया ,  2 वर्ष पहले
छो
बॉट: पुनर्प्रेषण ठीक कर रहा है
(Bluelinking 1 books for verifiability.) #IABot (v2.1alpha3)
छो (बॉट: पुनर्प्रेषण ठीक कर रहा है)
 
 
'''सामाजिक स्वामित्व''' का सन्दर्भ [[समाजवादीसमाजवाद]] आर्थिक प्रणालियों में [[उत्पादन के साधन|उत्पादन के साधनों]] के लिए स्वामित्व के विभिन्न प्रकारों से हैं; इस में [[सार्वजनिक स्वामित्व]], [[कर्मचारी स्वामित्व]], [[सहकारी|सहकारी स्वामित्व]], इक्विटी का नागरिक स्वामित्व,<ref>{{cite book |last=O'Hara |first=Phillip |title=Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |date=September 2003 |isbn=0-415-24187-1 |page=71 |quote=In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.}}</ref> और [[आम स्वामित्व]]<ref name="The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought">{{cite book |last=Hastings, Mason and Pyper |first=Adrian, Alistair and Hugh |title=The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=December 21, 2000 |isbn=978-0-19-860024-4 |page=[https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hast/page/677 677] |quote=Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a ‘co-operative commonwealth’ could not be the result of the ‘general nationalization of all industries’ unless there was a change in ‘the character of the state’. |url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hast/page/677 }}</ref> शामिल हैं।
 
==शब्द का दुरुपयोग==
85,949

सम्पादन