"विकिपीडिया:चौपाल": अवतरणों में अंतर

::Even in those cases redirecting would be better. Sub-stubs would only add to the bloat. Also we want to control the amount of redirects we have, sometimes we might have to leave some misspellings without creating anything. By the way I hope I understood you correctly, if not, could you give an example about what you are trying to say? --[[सदस्य:Spundun|स्पंदन (Spundun)]] ०२:००, २९ मार्च २००७ (UTC)

:::What I meant was that among the very few purposes served by substubs (let aside potentials), having a page with correct spelling is a major one. The Nepalese wikipedians had a presentation in Jagadamba-Madan Guthi, one of the most renouned places in Nepalese literaturare and linguistics and the critics there questioned about spellings and suddhata which was a bit difficult to handle. Grammar and correctness is a bit difficult in Sanskrit derived languages (also there are different rules in different languages which makes it harder for multi-lingual editors), so these substubs, if present, serve as a model title to work onto. I do not favor creating more of these types (in a situation where we have 10,000 articles already) but I do not favor the immediate deletions of those created hitherto. A correction/redirection bot is be a better option for the purpose undoubtly, but keeping these pages that we already have wont harm as well. Thank you.--[[सदस्य:युकेश|युकेश]] ०२:१४, २९ मार्च २००७ (UTC)

 

==One liners==