सनातन सिख

सनातन सिख
	इस सनातन सिख चित्रकला में सनातन देवताओं के साथ सिख गुरुओं को दिखाया गया है। इसका रचनाकाल 1800 से 1850 ई० है।
महत्वपूर्ण आबादी वाले क्षेत्र
	पंजाब
धर्म
	सिख धर्म
भाषाएँ
	पंजाबी

सनातन सिख हरजोत ओबेराय द्वारा सन १९८७ में प्रस्तुत एक परिकल्पना है।^[1]^[2]^[3] जिसमें हरजोत उन सिखों को 'सनातन सिख' कहते हैं जिन्होंने १८७३ के सिंह सभा आन्दोलन के समय अमृतसर सिंह सभा बनायी थी।^[4] 'सनातन सिख' से तत्पर्य उन सिखों से भी है जो नाम के लिये अपने को सिख कहते हैं और पारम्परिक हिन्दू विचारों , प्रथाओं एवं पूजापद्धति का अनुसरण करते हैं। ^[5] यद्यपि डब्ल्यु एच मैक्लॉयड का मानना है कि खालसा की पहचान १९वीं शताब्दी तक आकर खत्म हुई थी, जबकि हरजोत ओबेराय मानते हैं कि "सनातन सिख धर्म परिपाटी" ने १८वीं शताब्दी की "खालसा पहचान" को समाप्त कर दिया था।^[3]

इन्हें भी देखें

सन्दर्भ

↑ Grewal, J. S. (2010). "W.H. McLeod and Sikh Studies" (PDF). Journal of Punjab Studies. 17 (1–2): 125, 142. अभिगमन तिथि: 19 August 2020. McLeod has thus come round to accept Harjot Oberoi's hypothesis of 'Sanatan' Sikhism.
↑ Grewal, J. S. (1997). Historical perspectives on Sikh identity. Publication Bureau, Punjab University Patiala. p. 25. ISBN 9788173803598. Oberoi's view of Sikh tradition in the early nineteenth century is radically different. He refers to it as 'Sanatan' Sikh tradition and believes that it displaced the eighteenth century Khalsa tradition. This new tradition had begun to emerge in the late eighteenth century, and remained dominant in the nineteenth century.
↑ ^अ ^आ Singh, Harpreet (2014). "16: 'Western' Writers on the Sikhs: Religious Boundaries". In Singh, Fenech; Pashaura, Louis E. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Sikh Studies. Oxford University Press. pp. 208–209. ISBN 9780191004124. While McLeod continues to see the dominance of the Khalsa identity well into the nineteenth century, Oberoi sees the emergence of a 'Sanatan Sikh tradition' that displaced the eighteenth-century 'Khalsa episteme' (Oberoi 1994: 92).
↑ Louis E. Fenech; W. H. McLeod (11 June 2014). Historical Dictionary of Sikhism. p. 273. ISBN 978-1-4422-3601-1.
↑ Singh, Gurharpal; Shani, Giorgio (Nov 25, 2021). Sikh Nationalism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 42–44. ISBN 9781009213448.

इन्हें भी देखें

सनातन सिख सभा

[1] Grewal, J. S. (2010). "W.H. McLeod and Sikh Studies" (PDF). Journal of Punjab Studies. 17 (1–2): 125, 142. अभिगमन तिथि: 19 August 2020. McLeod has thus come round to accept Harjot Oberoi's hypothesis of 'Sanatan' Sikhism.

[2] Grewal, J. S. (1997). Historical perspectives on Sikh identity. Publication Bureau, Punjab University Patiala. p. 25. ISBN 9788173803598. Oberoi's view of Sikh tradition in the early nineteenth century is radically different. He refers to it as 'Sanatan' Sikh tradition and believes that it displaced the eighteenth century Khalsa tradition. This new tradition had begun to emerge in the late eighteenth century, and remained dominant in the nineteenth century.

[rb-3] अ ^आ Singh, Harpreet (2014). "16: 'Western' Writers on the Sikhs: Religious Boundaries". In Singh, Fenech; Pashaura, Louis E. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Sikh Studies. Oxford University Press. pp. 208–209. ISBN 9780191004124. While McLeod continues to see the dominance of the Khalsa identity well into the nineteenth century, Oberoi sees the emergence of a 'Sanatan Sikh tradition' that displaced the eighteenth-century 'Khalsa episteme' (Oberoi 1994: 92).

[fenech273-4] Louis E. Fenech; W. H. McLeod (11 June 2014). Historical Dictionary of Sikhism. p. 273. ISBN 978-1-4422-3601-1.

[:2222-5] Singh, Gurharpal; Shani, Giorgio (Nov 25, 2021). Sikh Nationalism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 42–44. ISBN 9781009213448.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]